575
My Complaints of Miss Representation
For the
past couple weeks, we have been watching Miss
Representation in my AP Language & Composition class. This film attempts to persuade viewers of the
prejudice and inequality towards women, in all aspects of life, all across the
world. We watched this film as part of
our current subject of study, argument and persuasion. While watching, I questioned many of the
statistics used as evidence in the film, and I decided to investigate.
I also
happen to be taking AP Statistics this year, in which I have learned the
correct methods for scientific experiments and gathering information properly
representing a population. I found Miss Representation’s website, and then
quickly found the page on which they show the sources for some of their statistics.
Information on the rest of the statistics will be “coming soon.” I looked at many of these sources, and was
overall unimpressed. I will explain my
complaints on one of these sources, just as one example.
This film
states that “65% of American women and girls have disordered eating behavior.” The link to the source for this statistic was
right below on the website’s source page, and it sent me to an article by ABC
News on April 26, 2008. The beginning of
the article reads as follows:
“Nearly
two-thirds (65 percent) of young American women report disordered eating
behaviors, and 10 percent report symptoms of eating disorders such as anorexia
and bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder, a new survey finds. The findings -- from an online poll of more
than 4,000 women between the ages of 25 and 45 -- found that 75 percent eat,
think and behave abnormally around food. The survey was conducted by SELF magazine in partnership with the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.”
The problem
with this statistic is that Miss
Representation generalizes it to the entire population of women and girls
in America, which is not appropriate.
This is because this statistic is from an online poll, which used no
method of random sampling, but rather convenience sampling. This means that results weren’t taken from a
randomly selected sample of people, but rather from people who clicked on a
survey. This creates response bias, which
is a situation in which some of the population in systematically excluded from
the survey as a result of the method of sampling.
The reason
this is a problem is because this survey systematically excluded all people who
don’t use a computer, go online less often, are too young to use the internet,
didn’t see the survey, chose not to do the survey…the list goes on and on. It also favored respondents who have little
to do, or enjoy participating in online surveys, want to report their problem,
or in my teacher Mr. Neff’s words, are really “Gun ho!” about this particular
subject. In the end, the people in this
survey create a very poor and very biased representation of the population to
which it is generalized. It is not
appropriate to claim that results from this survey apply to all women and girls
in America.
This is just
one example of poor statistics used by Miss
Representation, and I can honestly say that I saw similar problems with
over half of the ones I looked at. I
agree with the claim’s idea that women are still discriminated against, and I
don’t need all of these exaggerated statistical claims to convince me. The numbers just aren’t correct.
No comments:
Post a Comment